Reading: A mandate to self archive? The role of open access institutional repositories

Download

A- A+
dyslexia friendly

Articles

A mandate to self archive? The role of open access institutional repositories

Author:

Stephen Pinfield

Abstract

Based on a paper presented at the UKSG seminar 'Scientific Publications: Free for all?', The Geological Society, London, Tuesday 23 November 2004

This paper argues that the best way to achieve major improvements in scholarly communication in the short and medium term is to make it mandatory to deposit research papers in open access institutional repositories. This is what the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee report of 20041 on scientific publishing recommended. The paper defines what open access repositories are and explains why they should be institutional. It also deals with the question of what should be deposited in institutional repositories and why these improve scholarly communication. It then deals with the issue of mandating deposition: why deposition should be mandatory, who should mandate deposition and who should carry out deposition. The paper concludes with an analysis of the wider implications of mandating deposition in institutional repositories and a summary of the existing situation in the UK and elsewhere. It discusses the Select Committee report and the UK Government response in relation to institutional repositories.

DOI: http://doi.org/10.1629/1830
How to Cite: Pinfield, S., (2005). A mandate to self archive? The role of open access institutional repositories. Serials. 18(1), pp.30–34. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1629/1830
16
Citations
Published on 08 Mar 2005.
Peer Reviewed

Downloads

  • PDF (EN)

    comments powered by Disqus